The podcast Duffy and I decided we would focus on Olympic hockey. We
chose to focus on who we think will win the gold medal, and who will win the
quarterfinals. We did this with no script and just based off of our knowledge
of hockey. We did this after watching the USA game.
After watching that, it gave us a better view on Team USA and how they
played. I personally have watched all of the other countries play and recognize
what their styles of hockey are used in the game. I personally chose different
teams than Duffy because it is who will win, in our opinion and why in each of
the remaining three games.
We both came to the agreement that Team USA and Team Sweden would make
it to the finals, but from there our views differed as Duffy said Team USA
would win and I said Team Sweden would win.
We stated facts about why a certain team would win gold as a back-up
for evidence to our theory of who will win.
Doing this podcast was really fun, I would not mind doing this again
because it is really nice to give my views on hockey and what I am seeing and
the difference in views from Duffy and myself.
We both came into the idea of this while watching Olympic hockey.
We also noted that we have to be speaking with unbiased opinions in
this, as any sportscaster has to do. If there is some biases in an argument
then it is easily noticed. This is why we tried to avoid clichés such as this
player is not that good because they are not good. Our main goal was to use
facts we knew from
Instead we backed it up with facts such as Sidney Crosby has not been
producing the numbers Team Canada would like as their top line has only
produced two points in the past games. Most top lines produce at least three to
four, or even more, well depending on the team.